Newly established Facebook Oversight Board overturns 4 of 5 items in its first decision

“Today’s decisions and future decisions made by the board are binding on Facebook, and we will restore or remove content based on their determination,” said Monica Bickert.
Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on digg
Share on pocket
Share on telegram
Share on reddit
Share on pinterest
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on stumbleupon
Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on digg
Share on pocket
Share on telegram
Share on reddit
Share on pinterest
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on stumbleupon

In its first decisions, Facebook Oversight Board has overturned four out of five posts removed by Facebook previously. The Board was established in October 2020 as an independent body to make decisions regarding controversial content on Facebook and Instagram. Since its launch, more than 150,000 cases have been appealed to the Board. 

According to the Board’s website, it uses independent judgment to support people’s right to free expression and ensure those rights are being adequately respected. 

“The board's decision will be binding, meaning Facebook will have to implement them, unless doing so could violate the law.”

Facebook and other social media giants have been receiving serious backlash for their censorship of what some claim to be “free speech”. In January 2021, former US President Donald Trump was banned from many social media platforms, including Facebook, following the riots at Capitol hill.  

Many leaders worldwide called for other countries to unite and ban these social media tech giants or hold them accountable for their role in promoting online hate groups, spread of misinformation, and political censorship. Some of these leaders, like the President of Mexico, Poland’s Prime Minister and others, have expressed that though they did not necessarily agree with Donald Trump, they also do not agree with how he has been censored on social media. 

One of the overturned decisions, however, has received backlash. A Myanmar user had posted photos of a deceased child with the phrase, “There is something wrong with Muslims  psychologically,” as written in the Board’s description of the case. The board viewed the phrase as “commentary on the apparent inconsistency between Muslims’ reaction to events in France and China.” 

Photo: Courtesy of Oversight Board, case number 2020-002-FB-UA

On January 29 2021, the Board announced that it will be opening the public comments process. Two cases have been selected, including the case relating to former President Trump’s indefinite suspension from Facebook and Instagram. Its case number is 2021-001-FB-FBR. The posts under review that have been deleted by Facebook were both posted by Trump. 

One of the posts is a video by Trump, where he is asking his supporters to go home and keep peace. The second post is a statement written by Trump. According to Facebook, the first post was removed because it violated its Community Standard on Dangerous Individuals and Organizations. The second post was removed under the same standard. 

The first post that violated “Community Standard on Dangerous Individuals and Organizations policy (Video: Courtesy of Associated Press via Youtube). 

The second post removed was a statement put out by Trump that also violated the same policy.

“These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly unfairly treated for so long. Go home with love in peace. Remember this day forever!"

President Trump via Facebook

According to Monika Bickert, Vice President of Content Policy, Facebook continues to base their guidelines on health and COVID-19 regulations, and on advice from CDC and WHO. 

“Included with the board’s decision are numerous policy advisory statements. According to the  bylaws we will have up to 30 days to fully consider and respond to these recommendations. Today’s decisions and future decisions made by the board are binding on Facebook, and we will restore or remove content based on their determination,” said Bickert. 

Wiki Production Code: A0568

The political economy of fear

[S]ince love and fear can hardly exist together, if we must choose between them, it is far safer to be feared than loved.  — Niccolò

Is the government tracking our cell phones?

Both Premier Doug Ford and Toronto Mayor John Tory admitted to obtaining cell phone data to track people during the pandemic, raising ethical and legal questions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Passion for the Truth. Compassion for People.

Facts, Logic and Reasoning guide our process

We strive to challenge our own bias through an open sourced platform.

We search for the inner connection between all people aiming to bridge divides.